Mercantile Bancorp (MBR) Announces First Quarter 2010 Financial Results
QUINCY, IL–(Marketwire – 05/11/10) – Mercantile Bancorp, Inc. (AMEX:MBR – News)
-- Net Income of $984,000 -- Net Interest Margins Rise Year-Over-Year -- Loan, Asset Quality Stable -- Strong Expense Controls Continue at Banks
Mercantile Bancorp, Inc. (AMEX:MBR – News) today reported unaudited net income from both continuing and discontinued operations of $984,000 or $0.11 per share for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 compared with a net loss of $876,000 or $(0.10) per share for the same period in 2009. The Company’s 2009 financial statements have been restated to reflect discontinued operations due to the sale or exchange for debt of three of its subsidiary banks in December 2009 and February 2010.
Net income in first quarter 2010 included a $4.2 million pre-tax gain on the sale of two banks, which was announced in 2009 and closed in February 2010. The results reflect continuing solid operating performance for the Company’s largest subsidiary, Mercantile Bank, and its continuing efforts to reserve aggressively for potential loan losses at Heartland Bank in Leawood, Kansas and Royal Palm Bank, based in Naples, Florida.
The Company reported net interest income from continuing operations of $6.1 million in first quarter 2010, an increase of 27.2% compared with $4.8 million the previous year’s first quarter. This was the second consecutive quarter-over-quarter growth in net interest income, reflecting both improved cost of funds management at its banks and reduced debt at the Company.
“We are encouraged that our strong focus on generating core checking, savings and money market deposits and strategic re-pricing of higher-cost time deposits had an impressive positive impact on net interest income, with net interest margin improving to 2.46% for the first quarter of 2010 compared with 1.81% a year ago,” said Ted T. Awerkamp, President and CEO.
Provision for loan loss expense increased to $4.0 million in first quarter 2010 compared with $2.8 million in the same period in 2009. “We maintained our aggressive approach in building loan loss reserves in the first quarter of 2010, and we have achieved transparency in the loan portfolios of all three subsidiary banks as they have worked through asset quality issues over the past two years,” said Awerkamp. “We continue to receive reductions in valuations of properties that collateralize loans due to the depressed real estate markets, especially in Florida. However, our troubled loans have been identified and we are benefitting from sales on foreclosed properties held for sale at reasonable levels to our marking, so we are beginning to see traction.” Non-performing loans of $46.1 million at March 31, 2010 were essentially stable compared with first quarter 2009, decreasing from $50.8 million at December 31, 2009.
Awerkamp continued, “The exchange of one bank in late 2009 and sale of two banks in early 2010 served to bolster the Company’s capital position, reduce debt and maintain or exceed capitalization requirements at each of the remaining subsidiary banks. Core deposits at our banks have been stable, and in some markets growing, providing access to attractively priced funding for loans. Combined with ongoing expense management, we are well-positioned to maintain lending opportunities to good customers, and react to attractive opportunities.”
The Company reduced noninterest expense from continuing operations to $8.26 million in first quarter 2010 compared with $8.54 million the prior year’s first quarter. Total noninterest income from continuing operations was $1.8 million in first quarter 2010, compared with $2.0 million in first quarter 2009. The decline primarily reflected fewer gains on loan sales year-over-year, due to the slow-down in residential mortgage refinancing. Awerkamp noted the Company leveraged slightly improving economic and investing conditions to increase revenue from both fiduciary activities and brokerage services.
“Our fiduciary and brokerage services are being well-received as investors seek expert advice and investment management capabilities,” said Awerkamp. “As markets continue to be unpredictable and with an uncertain long-term economic outlook, we believe investors and advisors are seeking the additional stability of sound professional advice provided through our unique trust offerings and bankers they know and respect.”
Total assets at March 31, 2010 decreased to $1.0 billion compared with $1.4 billion at December 31, 2009, primarily reflecting the sale of two subsidiary banks in February 2010. Total loans from continuing operations at March 31, 2010 declined to $756.3 million from $776.7 million at December 31, 2009 as the Company continued to eliminate troubled loans and specific lending relationships that were not able to meet stronger credit standards. Total deposits from continuing operations at March 31, 2010 dropped to $885.2 million compared with $954.5 million at year-end 2009, primarily due to the decreased funding required for the loan portfolio and a reduction in higher-cost brokered time deposits.
“We have purposely let certain loans and deposits go at all three banks as part of our strategy to concentrate on optimizing returns,” explained Awerkamp. “We are creating a sound foundation of the highest quality from which to grow during the coming months.”
Subsidiary Bank Operating Highlights
Mercantile Bank continues to generate solid performance despite relatively flat loan demand, noted Awerkamp. The Bank’s served markets, including Quincy, Illinois, St. Joseph, Missouri and Carmel, Indiana did not suffer dramatic economic declines that were seen in other areas of the country, but he said they have not shown any meaningful signs of growth. Mercantile Bank was able to improve net interest income nearly $900,000 year-over-year, in large part due to margin improvement that led to a $1.4 million reduction in interest expense in first quarter 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
Mercantile Bank continues concentrating on small to mid-size business and agriculture lending in concert with a range of relationship opportunities that generate service revenue and core deposits. “A combination of exceptional customer service and a full range of business banking capabilities enables us to win new business and market share,” explained Awerkamp.
“Heartland Bank’s performance in the first quarter of 2010 showed improvement,” said Awerkamp, reflecting a stabilizing loan portfolio, a reduction in non-accrual loans and continuing operational controls. “Recently identified opportunities to trim overhead costs have put Heartland on an accelerated timetable to reach monthly operational profitability,” he added.
Royal Palm Bank has made significant progress in working through its asset quality issues over the past two years, and while loan losses continued in first quarter 2010, Awerkamp noted there were no unexpected difficulties. The Southwest Florida economy remains severely depressed, with weakness in commercial real estate and declining property values. There have been numerous bank failures in the market, while Royal Palm has maintained a well-capitalized status according to regulatory standards. Core deposits at the Bank have remained stable as its management team focuses on building relationships with small businesses.
“Although we don’t welcome the fact that Southwest Florida banks are failing at unprecedented levels, we do believe this presents a long-term market share opportunity for the surviving banks,” said Awerkamp. “Our new management team has improved control and transparency related to problem loans and the Bank’s basic operations. The improvements made have been overshadowed by a relatively small number of large troubled loans. We have reserved aggressively for these and have maintained a healthy capital position. The ability to work through these loans in unison with capturing quality business opportunities is the key to creating a positive long-term scenario for Royal Palm.”
Outlook
In the coming months, Mercantile Bancorp will maintain its focus on retaining customers, identifying and winning high-quality service and lending relationships, and operational expense controls.
“In first quarter 2010, we were particularly pleased with our success in building net interest margin, and we believe the positive impact of forthcoming expense reductions will generate further benefits as the economy improves and we are able to win new loans and deposits,” said Awerkamp. “Over the past several years, we have built a strong back office with the latest technology, which will provide a significant competitive advantage as Royal Palm and Heartland complete their migration to our systems. As a $1 billion asset holding company, we provide our subsidiary banks with significant advantages over smaller institutions in a highly competitive banking environment.”
About Mercantile Bancorp
Mercantile Bancorp, Inc. is a Quincy, Illinois-based bank holding company with majority-owned subsidiaries consisting of one bank in Illinois and one each in Kansas and Florida, where the Company conducts full-service commercial and consumer banking business, engages in mortgage banking, trust services and asset management, and provides other financial services and products. The Company also operates Mercantile Bank branch offices in Missouri and Indiana. In addition, the Company has minority investments in seven community banks in Missouri, Georgia, Florida, Colorado, California and Tennessee. Further information is available on the company’s website at http://www.mercbanx.com/.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release may contain “forward-looking statements” which reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“the Act”) provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements that are identified as such and are accompanied by the identification of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. For these statements, the Company, together with its subsidiaries, claims the protection afforded by the safe harbor in the Act. Forward-looking statements are not based on historical information, but rather are related to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s expectations as well as certain assumptions and estimates made by, and information available to, management at the time the statements are made. Those statements are based on general assumptions and are subject to various risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the views, beliefs and projections expressed in such statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ from expectations, are set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and include, among other factors, the following: general business and economic conditions on both a regional and national level; fluctuations in real estate values; the level and volatility of the capital markets, interest rates, and other market indices; changes in consumer and investor confidence in, and the related impact on, financial markets and institutions; estimates of fair value of certain Company assets and liabilities; federal and state legislative and regulatory actions; various monetary and fiscal policies and governmental regulations; changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations and their impact on the Company’s financial statements. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” and similar expressions often signify forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements in this release speak only as of the date of the release, and we do not assume any obligation to update the forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements.
Mercantile Bancorp, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, December 31,
2010 2009
------------- --------------
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $ 88,205 $ 121,267
Securities 126,950 130,484
Loans held for sale 788 681
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses 736,559 757,138
Premises and equipment 25,221 25,670
Interest receivable 3,703 3,962
Cash surrender value of life insurance 15,149 15,011
Goodwill - -
Other 46,430 50,277
Discontinued operations, assets held for
sale - 285,992
------------- --------------
Total assets $ 1,043,005 $ 1,390,482
============= ==============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Deposits $ 885,230 $ 954,524
Short-term borrowings 25,899 30,740
Long-term debt 76,858 87,030
Interest payable 4,542 4,114
Other 4,918 4,827
Discontinued operations, liabilities held
for sale - 264,044
------------- --------------
Total liabilities 997,447 1,345,279
------------- --------------
Total Mercantile Bancorp, Inc.
stockholders' equity 42,590 41,302
------------- --------------
Noncontrolling Interest 2,968 3,901
------------- --------------
Total equity 45,558 45,203
------------- --------------
Total liabilities and equity $ 1,043,005 $ 1,390,482
============= ==============
Mercantile Bancorp, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Three Months Ended
------------------------
March 31, March 31,
2010 2009
----------- -----------
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
Interest Income:
Loans and fees on loans $ 10,238 $ 11,404
Securities:
Taxable 970 1,182
Tax exempt 210 244
Other 90 83
----------- -----------
Total interest income 11,508 12,913
----------- -----------
Interest Expense:
Deposits 4,171 6,331
Short-term borrowings 187 550
Long-term debt 1,013 1,206
----------- -----------
Total interest expense 5,371 8,087
----------- -----------
Net Interest Income 6,137 4,826
Provision for Loan Losses 3,990 2,785
----------- -----------
Net Interest Income After Provision
for Loan Losses 2,147 2,041
----------- -----------
Noninterest Income:
Fiduciary activities 581 568
Brokerage fees 299 193
Customer service fees 365 365
Other service charges and fees 139 107
Net gains (losses) on sales of assets 8 (10)
Net gains on loan sales 92 517
Net gains on sales of available-for-sale
securities - -
Other 293 243
----------- -----------
Total noninterest income 1,777 1,983
----------- -----------
Noninterest Expense:
Salaries and employee benefits 4,405 4,464
Net occupancy expense 598 600
Equipment expense 563 585
Deposit insurance premium 471 611
Professional fees 491 559
Postage and supplies 148 176
Losses on foreclosed assets 212 102
Other than temporary losses on
available-for-sale and cost method
investments - -
Goodwill Impairment Loss - -
Other 1,372 1,441
----------- -----------
Total noninterest expense 8,260 8,538
----------- -----------
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
Before Income Taxes (4,336) (4,514)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) (1,190) (1,561)
----------- -----------
Income (Loss) from Continuing
Operations (3,146) (2,953)
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations 3,197 1,788
Less: Net Income (Loss) attributable to
Noncontrolling Interest (933) (289)
----------- -----------
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Mercantile
Bancorp, Inc. $ 984 $ (876)
=========== ===========
Mercantile Bancorp, Inc.
SELECTED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Three Months Ended
------------------------
March 31, March 31,
2010 2009
----------- -----------
(Dollars In Thousands
except share data)
(Unaudited)
EARNINGS AND PER SHARE DATA
Basic Earnings Per Share $ 0.11 $ (0.10)
Weighted average shares outstanding 8,703,330 8,703,330
Cash dividends paid per share N/A N/A
Book value per share $ 4.89 $ 11.26
Tangible book value per share (1) (3) $ 4.78 $ 7.62
Ending number of common shares
outstanding 8,703,330 8,703,330
AVERAGE BALANCES
Assets $ 1,082,957 $ 1,810,526
Securities (3) $ 128,577 $ 129,628
Loans (2) (3) $ 772,837 $ 850,252
Earning assets (3) $ 996,280 $ 1,067,907
Deposits (3) $ 922,610 $ 968,326
Interest bearing liabilities (3) $ 927,654 $ 1,053,326
Stockholders' equity $ 43,280 $ 98,781
END OF PERIOD FINANCIAL DATA
Net interest income (3) $ 6,137 $ 4,826
Loans (2) (3) $ 756,264 $ 843,442
Allowance for loan losses (3) $ 18,917 $ 17,201
PERFORMANCE RATIOS
Return on average assets 0.37% (0.20%)
Return on average equity 9.22% (3.60%)
Net interest margin (3) 2.46% 1.81%
Interest spread (3) 2.30% 1.77%
Efficiency ratio (3) 104% 125%
Allowance for loan losses to loans (2)
(3) 2.50% 2.01%
Allowance as a percentage of
non-performing loans (3) 41% 37%
Average loan to deposit ratio (3) 84% 88%
Dividend payout ratio N/A N/A
ASSET QUALITY
Net charge-offs (3) $ 3,924 $ 4,623
Non-performing loans (3) $ 46,060 $ 46,569
Other non-performing assets (3) $ 18,181 $ 9,668
(1) Net of goodwill and core deposit intangibles
(2) Loans include loans held for sale and nonaccrual loans
(3) 2009 column restated for discontinued operations and
assets/liabilities transferred to Held-for-Sale
TraderPower Featured Companies
- Annovis Bio Inc. (NYSE: ANVS)
- Astrotech Corp. (NASDAQ: ASTC)
- Cepton Inc. (NASDAQ: CPTN)
- Clene Inc. (NASDAQ: CLNN)
- CNS Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ: CNSP)
- Eloro Resources Ltd. (TSX.V: ELO) (OTCQX: ELRRF)
- Fintech Ecosystem Development Corp. (NASDAQ: FEXD)
- Freight Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: FRGT)
- InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ: INM)
- Lexaria Bioscience Corp. (NASDAQ: LEXX)
- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX)
- Mullen Automotive Inc. (NASDAQ: MULN)
- Scinai Immunotherapeutics Ltd. (NASDAQ: SCNI)
Top Small Cap Market News
- $ANVS Annovis Bio Inc. (NYSE: ANVS) CEO Discusses Findings of Buntanetap Phase 2/3 Alzheimer’s Study on the Bell2Bell Podcast
- $SCNI InvestorNewsBreaks – Scinai Immunotherapeutics Ltd. (NASDAQ: SCNI) Enters Into $2M Investment Commitment Agreement with Its Largest Existing Shareholder
- $INM InvestorNewsBreaks – InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ: INM) Announces Exciting INM-901 Data Providing ‘Attractive Therapeutic Approach’ in Alzheimer’s Treatment
- $SFWJ Hemp Industry Says Missouri Governor ‘Overreached’ When Banning Hemp Intoxicants
- $RFHRF InvestorNewsBreaks – Renforth Resources Inc. (CSE: RFR) (OTCQB: RFHRF) (FSE: 9RR) Shares Update on Completed, Upcoming Exploration Activities
- $MUX InvestorNewsBreaks – McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) Closes on Acquisition of Timberline Resources
- $ECGI InvestorNewsBreaks – ECGI Holdings Inc. (ECGI) Says Success of Allon Equestrian Apparel Line at AETA Is ‘Pivotal Moment’
Recent Posts
- $ECGI InvestorNewsBreaks – ECGI Holdings Inc. (ECGI) Says Success of Allon Equestrian Apparel Line at AETA Is ‘Pivotal Moment’
- $MUX InvestorNewsBreaks – McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) Closes on Acquisition of Timberline Resources
- $RFHRF InvestorNewsBreaks – Renforth Resources Inc. (CSE: RFR) (OTCQB: RFHRF) (FSE: 9RR) Shares Update on Completed, Upcoming Exploration Activities
- $SFWJ Hemp Industry Says Missouri Governor ‘Overreached’ When Banning Hemp Intoxicants
- $INM InvestorNewsBreaks – InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ: INM) Announces Exciting INM-901 Data Providing ‘Attractive Therapeutic Approach’ in Alzheimer’s Treatment
- $SCNI InvestorNewsBreaks – Scinai Immunotherapeutics Ltd. (NASDAQ: SCNI) Enters Into $2M Investment Commitment Agreement with Its Largest Existing Shareholder
- $ANVS Annovis Bio Inc. (NYSE: ANVS) CEO Discusses Findings of Buntanetap Phase 2/3 Alzheimer’s Study on the Bell2Bell Podcast
- $FLGC CannabisNewsBreaks – Flora Growth Corp. (NASDAQ: FLGC) Leveraging Colombia, US Facilities to Distinguish Itself Within Highly Competitive Space
Recent Comments
Archives
- August 2024
- January 2023
- June 2022
- December 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009